Home PageWoldingham Village Web Site
   
Woldingham Parish Council Minutes - October 2004

Woldingham Parish Council

 

MINUTES of a Meeting held at the Village Hall, Woldingham on 28 October 2004 at 7.30 p.m.                                           

Present:           Jeff Jeffery (Chairman); Maggie Bantick; Julie Moylan; Colin Packington; Michael Batterbury; Bobby Johnson; Rodney Fuller; Sally Marks

Also in attendance:     Karen Newman – The Clerk; Richard Butcher – part of the meeting

 

1. Apologies: Cllr Meekings          

2. Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on the 30 September 2004 had been circulated and were signed by the Chairman as a correct record subject to the following amendments:

8h. Station Parking – change name from Tim to Alan Greening; Change date to read 30 September

 

3. Declarations of Interest: No declarations of interest.

 

4. Matters arising: No matters arising.

 

5.  Planning Matters: With the agreement of Councillors the Chairman brought forward item 9c 

  1. Village Design Statement: The Chairman advised that the copy of the VDS, which had been e-mailed to all Councillors now had a couple of amendments, which needed to be agreed at the meeting.  The Chairman read out the amendments:

Pg7. Public Buildings and Areas: ‘Any new development must satisfy the need for additional parking off street’ to change to: ‘Any new development must meet the appropriate off street parking standards’.

Pg11. ‘Verges are a right of way and should therefore be maintained’ add after maintained: ‘and kept free from obstruction’.

The Council agreed the amendments and the Chairman advised that the VDS document would be e-mailed to Paul Newdick at Tandridge District Council Friday morning.

  1. Current Applications: Cllr Packington advised that there was one application to consider at the meeting: Choroni, Nethern Court Road.  Cllr Packington reported that he had looked at the plans and the proposals amount to 58% on what is actually there at the moment but the building had been enlarged before and so in fact the proposals probably constitute 100% increase in the Green Belt – the Council agreed that a letter should be written objecting to this application.

 A copy of Appendix A had been circulated to all members before the meeting and the Council voted to ratify the recommendations of the Planning Group. 

c.  Appeals:

Current

a.     Park Mews 17/11-11 Cllr Bantick was preparing the case and asked whether legal council is needed. The Chairman advised that each appeal needs to be considered on its merit and that advice would be taken, if a cost is involved it would have to be agreed by Council.

b.    Land adj Ferrers Land adj Ferrers – informal hearing 30 November.  Cllr Bantick advised that Cllr Batterbury had agreed to represent the PC and asked whether legal council is again needed.  The Council agreed that in this case we were supporting a strong case from TDC and it was unnecessary.

c.     Local Development Framework: The item was covered above. 

 d. Infringements:

Cllr Packington advised the meeting that he had e-mailed Mr Lawrence on the 20 October regarding various matters and had not received a response to his questions.  Cllr Packington advised that he will chase up Mr Lawrence and the report will be added to the end of the minutes as Appendix C.

 

6. Finance:

  1. Payments: The payments as Appendix B were signed and approved.
  2. Grants: The following grants were agreed at the meeting:

£500     - St Agathas re maintenance of churchyard

£400     - East Surrey Museum

£400     - Craigmyle Glebe – towards maintenance of children’s play area. It was agreed that a letter would be sent to them to point out that the Council were not happy that the area was as well maintained as it needs to be. 

£500     - Woldingham Neighbourhood Watch

£1,500  - Woldingham Scouts – fencing and outside area

  1. Precept 2005: The Chairman advised that he will be arranging a separate meeting to discuss the precept. 

 

7. Highways & Rights of Way:

a.Highways Monitoring and Reporting:  Cllr Fuller advised that he had received one report.  The Chairman advised that there is a blocked drain on the corner of the Green.  Cllr Marks advised that the white lining had now been done in Halliloo Valley Road. 

b.Crescent: The Chairman apologised that he had not arranged a Crescent Group Mtg but will arrange a meeting to take place in the next few weeks. Cllr Batterbury advised that the invoice for the paving in the Crescent would not be presented for at least another month and that the electrical contractors installing the new services to No 14 have been advised of the requirement to reinstate the walkway to the original specification.

c.Service Road: Cllr Packington advised that he would update any developments at the Crescent Group Meeting.

d.      Footpaths & Bridleways: The Chairman asked whether everyone had read the correspondence re Bridleway 44A in the correspondence folder.  Cllr Packington advised that he had walked on the public footpaths around the Tillingdown Farm area with Peter Stratton of the WA .They discovered that some of the footpath direction indicators and markings had been knocked over by lorries and this has now been reported to Surrey Rights of Way Officer.

 8. Reports:

a.      Neighbourhood Watch meeting 19/10 – it was reported that about 160 residents attended the meeting and there is now a co-ordinator for every road in Woldingham.  Some of the longer roads will require a second person as support but this is being addressed. Cllr Moylan advised that she is the co-ordinator for Station Road.

b.     P.C.P.G.  Meeting: 19/10 The Chairman advised that he had been told that these meetings are to be replaced by a more localised one with a different agenda, he will ask Cllr Meekings to update.

 

9.  Miscellaneous Matters:

  1. Airports: The Chairman advised that he had received the Agenda of the Flightpath meeting the day before the meeting and was unable to attend.  The Chairman confirmed that the request to extend operating hours had been rejected. Next meeting on 5/1/05.
  2. Village Appraisal:  nothing to report.
  3. S.M.R. Questionnaire:  Surrey County Council Sites & Monument Record Questionnaire – the Chairman passed to Cllr Marks and Bantick to fill out.
  4. Viewpoint on the Ridge: The Chairman advised that Surrey County Council had now put up the fence and that two seats still need to be replaced.
  5. Newsletter:  Cllr Batterbury advised that the next newsletter will go out at the end of January and asked all Cllrs to think about items to go into the newsletter.
  6. Recyling: Cllr Batterbury asked whether a further 15 composters should be purchased for sale at the next Spring Flower Show.
  7. Post Office:  nothing to report. 
  8. Station Parking: Nothing to report.  The Chairman advised that Sue Edwards had spoken to a representative from Railtrack who was parked at the station and advised that the repainting of the disabled parking spaces would be done shortly.
  9. Road Group: The Chairman advised that nothing had moved on since the meeting of the Tandridge Local Committee and the group is in the process of putting together a list of awkward junctions and bad signing around the village.
  10. Security:  The Chairman advised that he had asked the Clerk to contact SCAPT to see whether it is legal for Parish Council’s to contribute to a Community Officer.  The answer is that it is legal and a Parish Council in East Sussex is doing this and the Clerk will make contact.
  11. Dog Waste Bins: Cllr Batterbury advised that these had now been put in place and the item will now be removed from the agenda.
  12. Woodlea Parking: The Chairman advised that the meeting will take place in the evening and the Clerk will contact Sue Woollacott with dates.
  13. Litterpick:  Cllr Packington confirmed that he had written to the magazine thanking all those who took part in the recent Litterpick and advised that he has asked for suggestions re safety on the day.
  14. Trafalgar Day:  Cllr Packington confirmed that he had received literature and it was agreed that he would fill out and send off for more details.
  15. Highway Restitution Bond:  The Chairman advised that finally an answer had been received to the Parish Council’s suggestion of a Highway Restitution Bond which has been rejected by SCC but they have confirmed that they are looking into a Transport Impact Fee.
  16. Surrey Local Transport Plan: Cllr Moylan to read and fill in.

 

10. Meetings to attend

    1. WA/PC liaison meeting 1/11
    2. Standards Meeting Training 20/11 and 16/12
    3. ESPLG 30/11

 

11.  Correspondence:

The Correspondence folder for the month was circulated to all Councillors during the meeting. 

Cllr Packington advised that he had written again to Mr Westall re the Village Signs.

 

12.  Any Other Business:

a.         Diary: November diary was passed around for all Councillors to complete.

b.         Christmas Drinks: Cllr Moylan agreed to host pre-Christmas drinks and will advise of a date shortly.

 

Meeting finished at 10.13pm

2 members of the public attended.


Appendix C.

  

(The typing in blue italics is the response received from John Lawrence, Deputy Director of Environmental Protection (Planning)) 

  

Springfield, BW92

 

Following the Inspector's refusal of the Appeal, what action have you now taken on Mrs Sheeye for the removal of the disallowed structures and have you managed to negotiate an acceptable reduction in the ad hoc horse shelter accommodation.  - negotiations still in hand as basis for further application to establish reasonable level of stabling pursuant to Inspector's findings and compliance in New Year. 

  

Bromfield Stud : The Owner now having deposited his Appeal, what matters are included in his appeal and what type of appeal will be processed, if yet known.  - the appeal has apparently been withdrawn thereby activating the Notice.  Further discussions will be held with the owner to ensure compliance with the relevant time period. 

 

Mr.Drea's Property on BW92.   What action has now been formalised by TDC in respect of the structures erected without planning consent within the period of statutory limitations?  - enforcement action being prepared to secure removal of latest stable structures only. 

 

Park Mews, Marden : The planning application for change of use of the stable building having now been refused, is the way completely clear for the Magistrates hearing on 12th November?  - Court appearance deferred (2-3 weeks) to formally interview occupier under caution to satisfy legal advice. 

 

Whistlers Steep: What date did you issue Mr.Patel with an enforcement notice, and how much grace has he been allowed thereby?  - not actioned yet due to pressure of other work and priorities. 

 

Please note there were no diary dates given for the month of November.

 
Send any comments on these minutes to the Parish Clerk

Top of page